Ads2

Sunday 11 October 2009

MCA has just been saved.

The outcome of the MCA results would have been the best for MCA. I do not support MCA but when there is a good lesson, I give them credit. Ong Tee Keat lost. Dr. Chua Sok Lek lost. That's the most logical and best to do. Why? It is simple isn't it? Both were elected by the MCA members. Both started fighting. And both are now, more or less, voted out. The results says, look you idiots, if you cannot work together, both of you will now have to go.

Any winner would have been a death sentence to the organization. If there is a winner, people will continue to fight. When both idiots loses, it will suddenly dawn upon them they have erred. More importantly, the other monkeys in the future will remember to work and not fight.

Same goes for the workplace. If the bosses start to take sides, there will be endless fighting. There must never be a winner. There must only be a team. One team. I learnt my lesson back in University. We were not allowed to choose our lab partners and assignment partners. Strange right? The wisdom was simple - in real life, one does not get to choose his or her workmates, most of the time anyway. After all, *ahem*, this is the University of Melbourne. Ahem.

I have no idea why the some newspapers are screaming that the crisis in MCA has just deepened. It has just been solved. Everyone was expecting a winner. Sure, if one analyses the votes, it is split in the middle. By a darn small margin, the outcome was great.

And the biggest winner of them all? The bookies. No one expected both parties to be kicked out. Such is life.

No comments: