The AG maintains that the ink can be misused. His case is - if someone gets hold of the ink, and then, simply marks in on say all folks from a village. These folks would then be barred from voting, thus being unfair to them.
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2011/11/15/nation/20111115205440&sec=nation
So, my dear AG - how does this differ from the requirement to present MyKad to vote?
Someone pays the villagers RM 50 each, keeps their MyKad for 24 hours on voting day. Villagers, without the MyKad, cannot vote. Wouldn't that be a violation of their constitution rights?
We all know what is happening. Since MyKad is a require and it is a non-issue, what is the issue then with the indelible ink? I know. We know. It has to do with one of the 4Cs.... cheating.
No comments:
Post a Comment